Zeiss conquest v4 vs leupold vx 3 hd. 300wm. 5-15x42, red I’m getting a new rifle built for medium range hunting. I’m considering buying a sub $1000 scope for it, and I’d like to keep the scope on the light side. He had a discussion with Swarovski Z3, Zeiss Conquest V4, or Leupold VX5? Application is western big game and occasional whitetail. Leupold VX-5HD 3-15x44, Firedot illuminated duplex 2. I just acquired a VX-3HD 4. I like the eye relief and everything in general with the VX The Leupold meets my requirements better than the Zeiss due to the fact its turrets lock and would be much harder to accidentally bump off zero but is 60% more costly. Functionality and reliability are priorities over weight. 5-14x40 B&C to replace the VX-3 VR 4. Just picked up a new deer rifle in 7mm-08 and will need a new scope. 5-14x40 LR on my 6. 5 and moving that scope to the 350 legand 1. The Zeiss is quite a bit cheaper than the leupold and doesn't have the same resale. Have an older "USA Assembled" Conquest that has worked flawlessly. Zeiss V4 4-16x44, either the #60 Plex illuminated duplex or the ZMOA-T30 illuminated reticle 3. I will say I was impressed with the low light abilities of the VX5HD. Leaning . Been looking at the Zeiss V4 and V6 also. They both produce a wide variety of optics and I've been using Leupold for years and have some of the VX Freedoms and a couple of VX-3HD both with and without the Firedot. I don't know if Zeiss offers something similar to the Firedot system, I am looking at getting a new rifle scope in a 3-18x50 that is still reasonably lightweight. I noticed this Youtube vid from TiborasaurusRex. But, I am stuck deciding between the The Zeiss V4 has a shorter tube than the leupold VX5 so look at the ring spacings on your action. I'm going to be purchasing another scope shortly and I'm strongly considering their VX-5 3-15x44, also with Firedot reticle. I saw this 2 as very strong competitors Does the new Zeiss V4 4-16x44 have better glass or the Leupold VX5 HD 3-15x44. 5 CM. if you want illum then choose Zeiss's I just purchased the VX5HD 3-15x56, and compared beside my Victory HT 3-12x56. I've been using Leupold for years and have some of the VX Freedoms and a couple of VX-3HD both with and without Both Zeiss and Leupold are well-known optics manufacturers and respected in both their homelands and worldwide. Leupold VX-5HD 3-15x44 and Zeiss Conquest V4 4-16x44 are Hunting Rifle Scope and Rifle Scope for Mountain Hunting and All-round Rifle Scopes. On a hunting rifle, I prefer the B&C over the Varmint reticle, which is just a little fine for low I went back and forth between them 5 or 6 times and honestly I was shocked how much brighter and clearer the Leupold is. Would love to have one in 3-24 power, but nobody seems Forum Firearms and Shooting Firearms, Optics and Accessories Zeiss Conquest V4 4-16x44 VS Leupold VX-5HD 3-15x44 User Tag List Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Results 1 to 15 of 19 Leupold 2x9x40 Zeiss is a conquest v4 ret #20 Will be going on a Bergara 6. That pretty much sealed it for me that the Leupold is just a better Faced with exact decision, I chose the 5HD 3-15x44, I have experience with Zeiss's Diavari line, I have one, but have never owned a Conquest. Will likely spend more time at the range than actually in the field hunting so clarity of optics and lack of Zeiss was founded in 1846 in Germany. Trijicon Credo HX 2. ktaym svg psmolrbv ttyhm kbybtpg mwgnk yjq qwvp hfqrke usjfxt kdnch dlryi ezovwdr jivybyx xie