Amd vs nvidia gpu reddit

Yes, AMD cards currently have huge issues with masked foliage using Nanite. Definitely better bang for your buck on the CPU side. AMD's non-integrated GPU amount for 6. The only reason to consider the T550 is if you have something that specifically needs nvidia for some reason like CUDA; If you do, chances are you'd want a higher end card anyway though. Nvidia is ur only option for AI unless you want to spend more time debugging and pulling ur hair out, oh and it still might not run. King_Of_The_Munchers. €94. AMD and Intel graphics work better on Linux than they work on Windows. The developer The amd system is using freesync on an 144hz display. Nvidia is cheating, to reduce computational complexity and appear as if its performance to power consumption ratio is better. DLSS being the most noted, and with 4070ti + cards having DLSS I’ve only ever used Nvidia so i don’t know much about AMD graphics cards. 73%. not an expert but heres an article comparing nvidia and amd gpus in various 3d rendering apps (and a later revisit comparing blender 3. When the whole world is only interested In fps tests from. if you dont have a big budget amd. I'd personally rather a high quality 850 for an overpowered build than a mediocre 1000w. The other note which may or may not be significant to you is the AMD P16s didn't get USB4/TB support. Is this accurate and if so could you tell me which AMD gpu’s would be better options than a 3060ti/3070. Obviously it really depends on what kind of games you want to develop. scroatal. Nvidia care just as little about VR as AMD (as evidenced by them dropping the vr link port on the 3000 series cards). Edit: accidentally hit post lol. A 3060ti or a 6750xt. Generated by PCPartPicker 2024-04-08 14:33 CEST+0200. Is there a chart somewhere that compares the performance of like 3070, 3070 Ti, 3080 to AMD GPUs. If you don't have Nvidia Quadros/Teslas/RTX A cards, then go with AMD. and share the same cooling solution which takes up more than two slots. Reply reply. Their engine has had massive issues with drawcalls for awhile now. Meaning CPU render only. The GPU itself isn't as important to the streaming aspect so much as the actual CPU. 0, it might be cheaper to upgrade the dock or laptop than the GPU in the future, and your performance gains would be quite significant at 64 gbps vs. I believe AMD to be more bang for buck and am even in the market to upgrade to another amd gpu rn. psimwork. avoid AMD unless you can get a 30-40% faster AMD gpu for the same price. 611 votes, 150 comments. AMD cards are underutilized too, but they have better drawcall ops in dx12, so they get better performance at the same relative price to performance. Question So, I have been struggling with picking my cpu/gpu for my amd is value and performance. But in my opinion, AMD is the way to go. Total. Always. Interestingly if you want to stream using a hardware encoder Intel is the way to go. I must say i do like Nvidia cards much more in terms of performance but i respect I've seen various reports, that AMD image quality is just better. You have to use DisplayPort for the latter, but that’s typical for PC users nowadays. In the games that don't have visual issues with this series, they run super great in though. AMD has their own "equivalents" to these technologies, but they aren't really anywhere near as good as NVIDIA's stuff, even if it is proprietary. Dlss is better than FSR. Power Supply. Nvidia is sadly still the sole meaningful gpu for ML outside of a few rare cases. Currently the Nvidia system has an RTX 3090 and the AMD system an RX 5700 XT. Thanks, exactly what I'm looking for. A 6700xt or a 3060. They have a better encoder for better Link pcvr performance (since Link and VD AMD tends to support technologies that are open-standard vs Nvidia using exclusive technologies. 45%. As for amd vs nvidia. Nvidia is better only in specific scenarios like raytracing (though it still hit the performance hard even on Nvidia) or most of the workloads. I am team read, really like my 6700xt, promote amd, but if you think ray tracing look good and turn it on when you game, get a Blender runs perfectly fine on AMD GPUs. However, all the AMD cards are 16GB and I know that VRAM is important for VR. Nvidia. Nvidia is better for the high end only if moneys not a problem. Currently, AMD is still far behind on quality of H. 94. I use an AMD (6700XT) GPU, and for emulation alone some might be better off with Nvidia. Zero issues. Lastly the drivers suck. If you want the best value for 1440 gaming which is quite popular get 1 gen old AMD like 6700xt or better yet 6800xt. The other api to consider is openmp 5. I’ve heard for mid range budget cards they’re actually a better option compared to let’s say a 3060ti or 3070. The 6800xt will match a 2080ti in rt, but if you care in any capacity about ray tracing, get a nvidia card. Anecdotally, I've had more issues with my AMD hardware than Nvidia. All three hpc gpu platforms are targeting their own native apis: nvidia cuda, amd hip, intel dpc++. Amd image quality have always been better than nvidia. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things GPU amd vs nvidia . AMD is definitely better than Intel when it comes to multi-tasking, so streaming and gaming at the same time. This summer I have paid scalpers on eBay 2x & 3x list price for cards. Both the RX 6800 XT and 6900 XT take up slightly more than two slots. The AMD 7000 series has had quite a few problems with VR performance. IIRC, it's because none of the devs have a 7900 series card. AMD drivers often suck. I know for premiere pro u usually get faster exports. That said the 5800x3d is the best CPU and the 6950xt is the best GPU (both for gaming) so I would go AMD. I might be going intel cpu+integrated gpu with an amd 7000 series. There is almost no difference between 7800x3d, 7950x3d and 13900 in Honestly, for simple photoshop work you could probably do with something really simple like a 1050ti. Higher idle power and temperature until I moved second monitor to iGPU (which improved literally every possible performance metric). Support looks more in the side of nvidia, if only emulator development team leaders could convince AMD for their help, it would be great. 25% of Nvidia's share. x offloading which they will all support as first class citizens in their toolchains but is still currently Not only this, but Amd cards have more vram in them per model, which is a plus. You should check out whether AMD or Nvidia is more compatible (runs better)o with your software package. NVIDIA for everything else. ) There's rumors there will be a 7950XT & 7970XT due to how chiplets allow for exponentially better yields. 4070ti gives you access to NVENC, DLSS3, AV1 (also in the new AMD cards), and 3090ti performance. 637K subscribers in the FortniteCompetitive community. NVidia has more loyal fans, including fans who create gaming content, meaning better optimization and promotion for NVidia cards. bluewolf37. The 710 cards are also only 0. Pair it with an Nvidia GPU. Also no reason they cant have better power efficiency being the first designer of 5nm chips. Nvidia cards have nasty cpu overhead in dx12 as well, so that won't help. There's plenty of reports of people having issues with AMD drivers in Premiere Pro and games. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon…. 64 gb ram. If you're planning on branching out to offline renders, then usually if your scene doesn't fit into VRAM, then you're stuck without GPU acceleration at all. If I leave performance mode, the game is unplayable. also, it's becoming less relevant, but AMD's OpenGL still sucks. This post is to determine which brand gpu to buy. No unbearable flickering on XWayland due to Nvidia's missing implicit sync . On average, an AMD GPU will cost less for the same performance. Assuming this is only for work mentioned, not for gaming or anything. For Q4 2022, AMD pushed $1. 7. I am planning on using my CPU to render but I also read through Autodesk's requirements for 3ds max and they mentioned they strictly run on Nvidia. Nvidia gpus tend to work better because nvidia prioritizes making exclusive hardware/software to make their products work. I've had nvidia cards for years and never had any issues. SolidWorks built in simulator/flow sim doesn't use GPU acceleration so you can ignore the GPU choice for that. It looks like you are seeking tech-advice. For most 2D/3D applications the choice is irrelevant. 99 (about £910/AU$1,740) and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT starts at $899. In the same period, NVIDIA raked in $1. Not a single SKU above 0. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Gpu/Cpu choice: Amd vs Nvidia . Even if your chipset/dock doesn't support 4. for rtx yes at the moment for everything else no. When they did finally release an updated If so, here's a summary of the new cards: RX 6900XT (beats +2% 3090) - $999 MSRP. For Cpu amd and for gpu nvdia is better choice. Nvidia will have slightly better RT (and DLSS. . In the latest one the median GPU power is indeed between an RTX 3050 and a GTX 1070 Ti, which is the minimum specs. AMD no question, much lower multiples concerning P/E and price to free cash flow with more growth potential in my opinion, is destroying intel in gaining market share of CPU's and in data centers. nvidia lowers image quality for increased fps. Outside of integrated graphics Intel is almost non-existant in the gaming ecosystem. We can also look at the rx 7900 xtx vs the rtx 4080, which costs $100-200 more. 99 (about £685/AU$1,305), while the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti AMD wins in Rasterization, efficiency & price. 831 billion in revenues from semicustom chips powering Nintendo Switch console, GeForce NOW cloud-gaming service Sep 20, 2023 · The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080, meanwhile, has an MSRP of $1,199. I've used a 780 Ti, 970, 1070, Vega 64, 3090, and a Radeon 680M. 0 faster than AMD. Well, for one, Nvidia RTX 3000 series cards are currently more optimized to run RT than AMD RDNA2 Same price, no brainer: go 6800xt or 6900xt or 7800xt/7900gre if you can afford it. Varjo for example. So if you use blender regularly, go Nvidia. amd> nvidia. Top of the line m. 6800 is the competitor to 3070, not 6800xt. AMD focuses on developing open source, hardware agnostic solutions for gamers, while Nvidia trends to focus more on proprietary solutions. •. AMD however, they do not care how you use there hardware. If you only want to use this computer for 3d modelling, the only thing it's gonna matter for is GPU rendering. Nvidia for 3D modeling and CAD. Actually, all three work: AMD, Intel, Nvidia. Other than the immense amount of features you get in Radeon Software, you also aren’t forced to sign in. For gaming I find myself willing to spend 10-15% more for NVIDIA. I've measured it using my tools in the desktop, web browsers, games. Then there's the 4090 . But there are some nuances such as CUDA and AI, DLSS, raytracing thy could convince you to stick with Nvidia. However, when your choice is a 6650xt for $260 or a 3050. It works PERFECTLY on AMD. Like gfreeman1998 pointed out, if all you need is a display to the screen, the integrated graphics should be plenty. Currently in the process of building a pc to use 3ds max to model and render (VRay) however I am confused a bit on the GPU requirements for 3ds max. brotherbobbz • 2 yr. Feature quality on AMD is always “good enough”. I like Adrenalin CONSIDERABLY more than Nvidia Control Panel and NVIDIA cards support technologies like RTX and DLSS, while AMD cards really don't. It seems that the only edge Nvidia has is ray-tracing and DLSS. 0 at reconstruction and performance, AND nvidia cards run FSR 2. NVIDIA has a way better software for recording, filters, driver updated, etc. i have a ryzen 7 5800x for CPU, an MSI rtx3060, 32 GB of ddr4 and the game runs a smooth 100 fps on most maps at high graphics. Lol that difference in Yuzu is just pathetic. Although, Nvidia software is WAY better than Amd. The issue is mainly with pricing, often NVIDIA GPU's are more expensive for the same or less performance, you're basically paying a 'industry leader' tax. When Vulkan is finally gaining traction, Nvidia is beating AMD when it should have been the other way around. NVIDIA on the other hand got extremly lucky, overachieved in performance, surprised everyone including themself with the 4000 efficiency and with both the user get GPUs with 33% oversized coolers and VRM designs that run silent and with minimal coil whine with nearly every GPU variant. NVDA is trading at a ridiculous multiple and has run up of the news of a split which doesn't change anything. AMD driver may have improved but FWIW the Nvidia driver that has the launch CS2 profile in it came out on the 21st. AMD Workstation gpus are way too far behind in performance compared to the nvidia quadro line, and it doesn't seem like this will change with the next generation regardless of the AMD leaks. I've never spotted a difference between them in color reproduction. The thing that never ceases to amaze me isn't necessarily that folks think AMD GPUs perform better with AMD CPUs, but that Nvidia cards perform better with Intel because AMD purposely hobbles the performance of Nvidia GPUs to encourage people to buy their GPUs. Make an actual upgrade. Clear example of this being DLSS and FSR. D) They are more sought after, your resale will be higher. The nvidia laptop got an 165hz screen and g-Sync. It's why vega didnt make sense. Get an AMD processor. Probably going to look into both the 6700XT and 6800XT for 1440p High FPS gaming. I've used and continue to use both Nvidia and AMD hardware. Encoding speed across the board is faster in NVIDIA. Since I’ve gone freelance I’ve moved to tr4 and now to am4 5950x plus Nvidia 3090. Seems to be possibly related to AA but unsure. CPU = AMD NOT Intel. Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts. MaximumEffort433. A Ryzen 3rd gen. hmm yeah I was on a video of a video editor guy basically saying the amd gpu wasn't good for editing becuz of xyz, BUT in the comments I saw some people saying they have a good experience editing on davinci resolve, the issue is with adobe cuz they don't support something from amd, I didn't understand cuz I don't understand too much about AMD or Nvidia GPU for mostly CPU rendering. Nvidia cards look WAAAAY better. AMD backed Free Sync, a tech that can be enabled in monitor firmware, Nvidia focused on G Sync, a more expensive, hardware based solution. image quality> fps. 2 is what Fortnite runs on. They're all c++ apis and there's some compatibility interfaces but I wouldn't really rely on them. Linux is pretty much the only choice other than Intel for Linux as well. €2159. Nvidia isn't facing tough competition from AMD's RDNA 3 product stack, and Intel doesn't currently pose a serious threat to the GPU duopoly. Eiffel12. Go for NVIDIA if you plan on playing performance mode: AMD GPUs still have issues with it. I would say nivida but the absolute lack of VRAM in their latest GPUs is fuckin annoying. If money is no object then the 6800xt will trounce the 3070 in every single way, yes even for VR. AMD generally just works but even the latest AMD cards have had some driver issues on Linux depending on kernel you are using. Nvidia has a far more useful advantage of 4k, AND literally generationally ahead at RT. Finally, some other reasons why I believe AMD is better (in comparison to Nvidia equivalent GPUs): AMD GPUs are cheaper. 264 and H. BUT it's your decision. Generally speaking for any kind of gaming pc. Nicksj007. But even now in 2024, Nvidia definitely has way less issues than AMD does. Some headsets only work with Nvidia, or work better with Nvidia. In games that support it, DLSS can significantly increase performance to the point where NVIDIA cards can leave their Honestly, as a long time Nvidia buyer I will tell you straight: If you buy a GPU only to game, get AMD and Intel instead. Typically one can get more power for money with AMD, but with AMD cards being better at GPGPU processing, I don't know if My pc specs are going to be 14700k, decent 6000 mt/s ram and whatever else goes along with it. With the recent 3000s and 6000s from both camps, Nvidia seems to be skipping some fixing (or dropping the ball) for 3070, while AMD has minor none breaking issues that have work arounds. More instability at my own fault (overclock/undervolt tuning more aggressively than on my old GPU) but perfectly stable once I finished tuning. ChromeRavenCyclone • Desktop • 2 yr. Hi, Linus Tech Tips - Reddit vs PC Part Picker vs LTT Forum – Where Should YOU Go for Build Advice? November 18, 2023 at 09:50AM I’m a 3D DCC guy. 55-60 fps on the desktop. AMD cards over wireless to Quest are horrible compared to NVIDIA. AMD’s great. Taken side by side photos and captures. Take a 3060 12gb vs a 6700- the 6700 is generally the same price or cheaper, has 10gb of VRAM, preforms better, and even matches the 3060 in ray tracing. nvidia is more expensive but more features. Since nvidia bases their quadros and gaming gpus off the same architecture, and since there's a noticeable 50% increase for their most expensive server gpu Gaming laptop GPUs are dominated by NVidia. AMD GPUs have proper support from AMD itself. One just has to be mindful of Nvidia driver versions a bit more in Linux. And only 22% achieve the recommended rtx 2080 level of performance. I want to buy a 3070 or 3080 but I see AMD GPUs going on sale really often. Also typically laptops are kinda shit for training anything meaningful. If you are okay with DX12 mode, AMD is more cost efficient. GPU = Nvidia NOT AMD. The single biggest you can to improve performance for SolidWorks (and other CAD packages in general) is to get as much RAM installed as possible and go with the fastest CPU you can get. The desktop of course got an much beefier cpu, 5900x vs. If you ONLY need it for low poly models you don't have to worry about hardware at all. • 5 yr. 15% which means that all 3 of their cards aren't above 0. Ever since XT models, AMD realized they can compete and stick prices similarly to Nvidia. g. 265 encoding. AMD GPUs have more VRAM. 1. As in it's definitely worth paying the extra money for an NVIDIA card if wireless streaming. Personally as someone who uses a Nvidia chip, I'd say go for it. My opinion is, yes, switch to AMD. I have an NVidia GPU in my work PC right now and a Ryzen CPU, but that is mostly because it was the GPU option that was available at the time. 7900XT will win tbh. If you hate money get NVIDIA. •• Edited. Both the game and AMD drivers have been updated since then specifically to improve the stuttering issues. A recent report claims that the chipmaker has allegedly increased the production of its compute GPU products. And in case with Linux, AMD GPUs is also generally a better choice. 2. If there's not really a difference go with whatever's cheaper. 171K subscribers in the iRacing community. but yeah. I only went with Nvidia gpu because seriously, for DCC, AMD can not compete. AMD tends to be better price to performance and NVIDIA is better at ray tracing. Support for AMD tends to trail behind everything else, and it's not a guarantee, there are and will be products that simply will not work on AMD, or they may work, but doesn't work as well as on NVIDIA. I hope AV1 gets properly implemented soon tho, then it will matter much less which one you pick. More 4K, 8K textures, higher resolution renders. And is better value. DLSS has dedicated cores to run on while FSR just uses open source Reply reply. Also, graphics cards from AMD & Nvidia cost a fortune right now. cg_krab. Blender is not one of those situations, Nvidia shits all over AMD. I'm am familiar with the Nvidia GPU's performance. AMD generally works better for the consumer side in regards of Linux's compatibility, but for the professional and workstation cards, then Nvidia (Quadro, Tesla, RTX A) beats AMD (Radeon Pro, Instinct) by thousands of miles. 3. When the drivers are on point from NVidia it is golden but every once in a while a new driver doesn't work right with Linux. I threw it in, did the PCI passthrough and just works. 5800h on the laptop, but the laptop reports 70-80 fps vs. and in general, AMD GPUs unfortunaly cannot do everything an Nvidia GPU can. 8M subscribers in the Amd community. Subscribe to never miss Radeon and AMD news. AMD performance difference will be looked into, such big disparity between vendors is not supposed to happen. Gamer Nexus is pure gold. Performance wise AMD and NVIDIA will be about the same, but since AMD is cheaper, that means it has better performance per USD. It's understandable why Nvidia may prioritize compute GPU production over gaming GPUs. so in some ways, a slightly higher price Basically, driver support convinced me to switch to Nvidia, and driver support convinced me to switch back to AMD. AMD does seem to have more problems than NVIDIA and for work related tasks that may be a deal breaker. Welcome to the Unofficial iRacing Reddit Community. Not like constant hitches unplayable. Even if you are on a single screen, if you have a very comparable AMD / NVIDIA GPU, the NVIDIA GPU will still perform better in iRacing. And we always used AMD gpu and Intel xeon CPUs in our 2d workstation. 850 should be fine with the AMD build especially one of that quality. They DO have some advantages over AMD, specifically their raytracing performance, they have a streaming AMD is superior with Radeon Software, it’s so much better than GeForce Experience. • 8 mo. Some folks just buy them without thinking because it's Nvidia. RX 6800XT (matches 3080) - $649 MSRP. meanwhile most of AMD's features can be used by Nvidia as well. AMD is the best in fps per euro most of the time. Basically have to trick the Nvidia drivers that its not a VM. I don't know what that's like with photoshop though. AMD is cool and cheaper but falls behind on many other programs, not just Blender. is a two slot card. AMD CPU NVIDIA GPU. This portable system could take care of your gaming needs for a year or so while you wait for the video card prices to come down. A couple of games such as Xenoblade Chronicles 2 have a plethora of graphical bugs on AMD because none of its hardware supports the D24 depth format, whereas Nvidia does. AMD USED to have the single best color fidelity, period. Reasons for my surprise that the gap is so large: Nvidia ray tracing is marginally better from the 2000 to the 3000 series, both are better than the rdna 2 rt. Every time you see someone hitches unplayable. There should be more benchmarks that focus on image quality, rather than on frames per second. Nvidia is the best in nearly all professional categories, but AMD usually isn't that far behind. According to this article, it is G-Sync compatible, even if it's not certified: The Samsung Odyssey G5 is a FreeSync gaming monitor, but it’s also compatible with Nvidia’s G-Sync even if it’s not certified. I reported the issue to AMD, but they didn't release any driver updates for the 6000 series cards for over 3 months. They've been the main name in graphics cards for over 20 years, so they're a lot like Intel when it comes to graphics cards. Nvidia's investment in multi-threaded drivers has paid off while AMD's neglect in this area has resulted in years of poor DX11 and OpenGL performance. NVidia fans are often happier with NVidia drivers than AMD fans are happy with AMD drivers. • • Edited. NVIDIA is definitely a better choice currently. in Premiere Pro. You can buy a laptop with an AMD APU and play games at scaled down settings. Nvidia only has value now if you are a GPU multitasker i. This is not a post about building a pc, it's about which gpu BRAND has better settings for lowering graphical fidelity to the end of lowering gpu usage. 32 gbps. I've held off on playing BOTW on Cemu for a year now because the OpenGL performance is so fucking bad on AMD. DLSS3 alone, at least to me, makes the 4070ti the better buy at 800 than the 7900xt is at 900 even if the 7900xt has better raw performance. RX 6800 (beats +18% 2080Ti/3070) - $579 MSRP. Also the amd community is more niche and LOUDER than the nvidia community. Also a lot of 3D software requires either CUDA or OptiX which is unavailable on AMD cards. Affects both 6000 and 7000 series cards. The reports are all false. Interesting Even though AMD cards frequently performs better with Vulkan, Nvidia cards seems to by Rynide Ryzen 7 5800x, Nvidia 3070ti 8GB EVGA, 32GB DDR4 3600 CL18 RAM View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit It's always "AMD vs Intel CPU" or "AMD vs Nvidia GPU," but I think that this is the more important battle. I personally am sitting on a GTX 1080 Most consumer level AI tools and products are developed to work with NVIDIA because it has CUDA. 7900XTX or RTX 4090. AMD used to be reasonably priced lower due to Radeon middle or lower end tiers. Also, NVIDIA has the upper hand on ai technology which they focus on a lot. Just do NVIDIA. I had an old Radeon 560 around. Got 2 NVIDIA (1070 + 1070ti) and 3 AMD (6800XT, RX6000, 5600 XT)systems for VR, running either airlink or VD. Amd hardware are superior when it comes to games like squad/arma. Miladyboi. After using AMD cards for over 10+ years, I would vote Nvidia. Once AMD works out the kinks in their drivers, their cards tend to age better though. (Higher quality) VR performance is for some reason higher. NVIDIA is better in RT and efficiency, but different price tier *NV uses better silicon/node than AMD in 4000 vs 7000 series. AMD abandoned LiquidVR. Also for video encoding you don't need a high end gpu at all. e you use GPU for work and play. Cooler Master MWE Gold 850 - V2 850 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply. gpu this generation for that reason. Never spotted any differences. ago. Amd on the other hand tends to use open source software and somewhat generic hardware to make their products work. TLDR: yes, nvidia's lead in professional 3d rendering applications, especially those that can take advantage of tensor cores, is just that ridiculously far ahead of amd that even 3060ti, sometimes even the non ti can come close to 6900xt (if If you do AI/ML stuff (including features in new content creation platforms like Adobe photoshop that is starting to use AI more) or just want the fastest GPU on the planet get NVIDIA. from another planet, performance and price wise. For gaming on Linux AMD is the better choice. If you're planning on doing 3D games with up to date graphics, the 1TB SSD is enough to swing things to the AMD laptop on its own (in the other comment you made with the links) - Unreal and Unity installs hog primary drive space, and you really want your project on an SSD. if you have a big budget nvidia. Freely discuss news and rumors about Radeon Vega, Polaris, and GCN, as well as AMD Ryzen, FX/Bulldozer, Phenom, and more. Quick syncs x264 encoder is better than nvenc currently and their av1 encoder is also quite good. 99 @ PC Componentes. Nvidia Quadro and xeon for 3D. 0 vs 2. As the other guy said, for machine learning, you'll want a CUDA-capable chip. Where Windows users may shy away from AMD and Intel, there's absolutely no reason to do so with Linux . For a point of comparison we can look at the hwsurvey from November 2020 just before Cyberpunk launch. AMD just doesn't have the people and money Nvidia does to work in their GPU and drivers. 9M subscribers in the Amd community. performance is equal in many situations, but Nvidia has the better feature sets like CUDA and RTX. That backwards Nvidia card hurts! 21 votes, 48 comments. For video editing and capturing, Nvidia is the best choice for now. from what i know the best AMD GPU that supports Vista is the R9 295X2, according to Techpowerup it is 3% worse than the GTX 980Ti, also the R9 has 4GB of VRAM instead of 6GB of the 980 and also if you want more GPU power just buy another 980ti and run SLI or (Recomended option) Get a GTX TITAN X (supports Vista and it is faster than the 980ti), and if you want the best of the best (and have The ps3 emulator eats up 100% of cpu load. I mean ive had 3 amd gpus now and ive never encountered a single issue. They also have better drivers in general. 93). Benchmark date is 23/9. 4gigs of vram is plenty if it's just photo editting. And I run all low settings except view distance which I have on high. So either AMD's 5000/6000 series or Nvidia's RTX 3000 series would be priorities if you want longevity of the GPU. The Radeon Subreddit - The best place for discussion about Radeon and AMD products. You're in r/linux_gaming so you'll get a lot of AMD bias because there's no subtlety in the viewpoints of Redditors, much less Linux enthusiasts. It seems like even the Vulkan driver is subpar compared to Nvidia's implementation. amd vs nvidia (gpu) The market has changed, the competition fiercer than ever, the question is aflame and I want this settled While researching for the best graphics card in the market, to replace my 1660 super, I found that the gap between the two giants has almost become non existent (atleast in the recent generation of cards) Some applications can make use of gpu acceleration, whether amd or nivida/cuda cores are more beneficial depends on the application. Comparing the rx 7800 xt vs the rtx 4070, which costs $50 more. Nvidia does this specifically so that once you're using things that only their cards support (Gamestream, G-Sync, 3D-Vision, etc), you are pretty much stuck with them if you want to continue to use those technologies. 644 billion in GPU products encompassing all its markets, namely the semicustom chips powering Xbox Series X/S and PlayStation 5 consoles; and AMD Radeon products. . 3090 super. C) Nvidia has DLSS, which is better than fsr2. All though i heard you can do it with there quadro card. Nvidia GPUs work better for GPU accelerated tasks e. • 1 yr. benchmarks why would you not think the leader wouldn't cheat at the tests. It's like, AMD isn't going to do something exclusive that makes their GPUs perform Depending on the GPU choice. it depends on which card you are picking from either companies and the price to performance of them. In yuzu, depending on the card, Nvidia might still edge out mainly because the top end AMD cards (7900 series) still aren't having the bugs fixed in yuzu right now. tn to rd jy lv ur lh qn kq xb